Endangered Species: Endangered Again
|
September 8th, 2008 by Rory |

Photograph by Joel Sartore
The last month or so has proven to be rocky times for the well-being of endangered species in the United States. As if urbanization and changes in our climate weren’t enough trouble, the federal government seems to be putting a wrench in the plans for these precious animals to continue their road to recovery.
Currently, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is working on the final revision of a map that outlines the new dimensions of the habitat being set aside for the well-being of the peninsular bighorn sheep. Unfortunately, these new dimensions are nearly half the size the agency previously considered to be critical to the survival of the sheep. The new land will also be split into islands of reserved habitat in what was previously a contiguous piece of land. Need an analog on how this may effect the sheep? Just think about John Conway’s Game of Life. Very rarely do cells survive when broken up into smaller, unconnected bunches. In addition, the bighorn sheep are easily disturbed by human activity and susceptible to diseases and illness brought on by residential development and urbanization. In the mean time, U.S. Gypsum Co. is looking to expand its operations into land that may soon be considered former habitat.
Via the LA Times
In other news, the Associated Press reports that the Bush administration is looking to alter and potentially destroy the Endangered Species Act by relaxing its rules on construction and development projects. Currently, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service conduct consultations to determine whether a project will damage habitat or affect the well-being of any endangered species. The new revision will allow the Interior Department to do their own reviews without consulting any third parties. They believe by relaxing the rules they will be streamlining the process which some say has resulted in delays and increased construction costs. But, Eric Glitzenstein, the attorney representing environmental groups in the lawsuit, says it’s like “the fox guarding the hen house.”
Via the Associated Press
At the end of last month, Alaska Governor and Republican VP nominee, Sarah Palin, the American Petroleum Institute, the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Mining Association and the American Iron and Steel Institute all have joined to file suit again Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director H. Dale Hall. Sarah Palin and the five parties joining her are fighting against the Interim Final Special Rule which designates the polar bear as threatened under the Endangered Species Act and in turn as part of this rule, sets greenhouse gas exemptions for every state except Alaska. NAM says they don’t oppose the polar bear being listed as threatened but do oppose greenhouse gas controls in Alaska. NAM Vice President Keith McCoy said that it could curtail oil and gas exploration and that the controls put on Alaska may be opening a back door for greenhouse gas regulations nationwide. In the meantime, Kassie Siegel, climate program director for the Center for Biological Diversity, is sueing the federal government as well in order to have them change the polar bear’s status from “threatened” to “endangered”.
Via the Washington Post
Lastly, in good spirit, the grey wolves are to be put back on the endangered species list after the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service had removed them back in February. U.S. District Court Judge Donald W. Molloy granted environmentalists an injunction to the delisting and issued a 40-page critique of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s actions.
Via the LA Times
Hooray!
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
|
| Trackback |
Email Post
|
Tags: Alaska, Animals, Bighorn Sheep, Bush, Endangered, Grey Wolf, oil, Petroleum, Polar Bear, politics, Sarah Palin

I had a friend send me this link last week, and I thought it might be relevant here in regards to Alaska. The NRDC has a map representing the actual land needed to support proposed drilling in Alaska. The claim is that drilling would only effect 2,000 acres, but according to the NRDC – “Rather, it’s spread across the coastal plain in more than 30 small deposits, which would require vast networks of roads and pipelines that would fragment the habitat, disturbing and displacing wildlife.” There is a downloadable pdf from the site worth taking a look at. -megan
How did Cameroon loose so quickly. How quick was that. I believed that they had a good shot to do well in this years world cup. Maybe in four years. Maybe its time to jump on the Argentina bandwagon. Looks like Demichelis has already scored. Go Argentina. To make me feel better from that devistating loss by Cameroon, I have been listening to some funny jokes.. This one is pretty funny: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3j7uSbccSc
I believe your weblog is nice! I found it on Yahoo. I believe I will come back on day, thank you.
Glenne Baxter is the communicator of articles relating to rejuvenation and leisure in sharm el swayer .
Thank you for this post, I’ve been seeking for information about this subject for ages and yours is the best I’ve discovered so far.